Dakila associate responds to Carol Capel's criticism and challenges researcher to seek real experiences.

Understand the news at your own pace: To make the content more accessible while maintaining technical depth, this news story has been presented in two formats:

• Simplified version: Ideal for those who are not in the field, but are curious about the subject.

• Technical version: Aimed at readers with prior knowledge or professional interest in the topic. Choose the reading that best suits you—or enjoy both!

Recently, influencer Carol Capel once again criticized the Dakila Pesquisas institution on her channel, generating a strong reaction among members. One of the most recent statements came from researcher Rafael Hungria, who published an analysis questioning the content creator's stance and raising concerns about freedom of expression, sensationalism, and responsibility on social media.

Rafael recalled that, years ago, he participated in a livestream with Capel to discuss light phenomena recorded in Corguinho, Mato Grosso do Sul, the institution's research headquarters. However, according to him, the influencer deleted the broadcast from her channel and has since repeatedly attacked Dakila's work. The researcher asks, "Was she afraid of the information we shared?"

The member also emphasizes that Capel has never visited Dakila in person, instead relying on online information. For him, this lack of experience weakens any criticism. "Real researchers go into the field. Many have had firsthand experience, including academics. But she prefers to monetize cheap sensationalist videos," he states.

In the end, Rafael issues a direct challenge to the influencer: participate in an open, uncensored debate where both can express their views. According to him, only then will it be possible to show the public who truly seeks the truth and who relies solely on distorted information.

Accessible language: (News produced with the help of AI)

The relationship between digital influencer Carol Capel and the Dakila Research institution has taken on new dimensions following recent criticisms by the content creator on her platforms. Associate researcher Rafael Hungria published an analysis challenging the legitimacy of Capel's claims, emphasizing the role of empirical experience in validating UFO research and anomalous phenomena.

Hungria recalls that, in a previous live broadcast with Capel, luminous phenomena observed in Corguinho, Mato Grosso do Sul, the central region of Dakila's research, were discussed. However, according to the researcher, the influencer later removed the material from her channel, which, in his view, reflects a reluctance to handle information presented by firsthand witnesses.

Hungria's central criticism concerns the methodology. He points out that Capel relies on third-party materials and opinionated journalistic articles without having conducted field research or having direct contact with the experiments conducted by the institution. According to the researcher, this approach compromises objectivity and borders on "digital sensationalism."

The researcher concludes by proposing a public debate as a means of confronting different perspectives. For him, only open, unfiltered exposure can dispel any doubts, increase transparency, and demonstrate the importance of experience reports in the study of ufology and phenomena not yet officially recognized by academic science.

Technical language: (News produced with the help of AI) Sources: https://youtu.be/Fv3hTPhPKlI?si=ossptV2d22rzwVc9 ACCESS THIS PUBLICATION:

Want to share your opinion on this news? Visit our WhatsApp and Telegram channels, click on the social media links we provide, and share your thoughts in the comments!

WhatsApp: Dakila News | Notícias mundiais alinhadas às pesquisas do Ecossistema Dakila🔎 | WhatsApp Channel Telegram: https://t.me/+-dHipLWeOZQ5OG

🚨 This is news for informational purposes only.🚨